Editorial illustration
Editorial illustration
Editorial illustration
Editorial illustration
2026 Dwight Aguilar Masias; Yellow Gesha* - Peru
- variety idSEY says Yellow Gesha* is a working name for yellow-fruiting plants whose Gesha identity had not yet been genetically confirmed.
- gradeThe exact release is specialty coffee, but no formal green grade is published; the structured grade is therefore Not specified.
- roast levelSEY's exact product page does not state a conventional roast level; no value is inferred from roaster style or catalog labels.
- owner bag roast dateThe exact public thread identifies a February 16 roast date for that participant's bag, not the owner's bag.
- normalized public ratingThe only numeric values are three brew-method ratings from one commenter, not independent product scores from multiple reviewers.
- owner tasting inputNo owner tasting observations, score, verdict, or approval are recorded for this coffee.
FROM THE BAG
BACK TO THE LAND.
Every link we could verify, traced in one place. Follow the chain as far as it goes — when the industry doesn't disclose a link, we say so instead of guessing.
- 01The name on the bag2026 Dwight Aguilar Masias; Yellow Gesha* - Peru
- 02The brand
- 03The roaster
- 04The varietyYellow Gesha* (working name; genetics unconfirmed)
- 05The farm
- 06The farmer
- 07The region
- 08The country
Dwight Aguilar Masias is a third-generation producer at Finca Nueva Alianza in Santa Teresa, Cusco, and Peru's first two-time Cup of Excellence winner. He is closely associated with the yellow-fruiting coffee marketed as Yellow Gesha*, but SEY stated that its Gesha genetics were still unconfirmed.
Sey Coffee is a Brooklyn-based micro-roastery focused on sourcing and roasting complex, dynamic coffees while fostering long-term relationships throughout the supply chain.
SEY described this as its highest-scoring selection from a Peru sourcing trip. The farm's washed yellow-fruiting lot placed fifth in the 2025 Peru Cup of Excellence, but SEY explicitly says the working name Yellow Gesha* remains genetically unconfirmed.
WHAT DID THEY ACTUALLY
DO TO THIS COFFEE?
Confirmed producer, farm, Santa Teresa/Cusco, 1,900 m, November 2025 harvest, price, size and sold-out status.
Recorded 24 hours in cherry, flotation, depulping, 36 hours of dry fermentation and 20-day raised-bed drying to about 10% moisture.
Kept Yellow Gesha* as a working release name and left the structured variety empty because SEY says the Gesha identity was not yet genetically confirmed.
Recorded one exact independent brewing thread without converting one commenter’s three method ratings into a site or cross-person average.
Four sourced editorial sections plus a transparent one-source independent brewing-response summary.
No canonical Yellow Gesha relationship, generic roast level, house score or normalized public rating.
The profile communicates a commercially important release name while preserving SEY’s own genetic caveat and the limits of a very small public sample.
SEY lists jasmine, lilac, soft tropical fruit and melon. Independent brewers reported better results with gentler extraction, but the sample is too small for a product score.
- · https://www.seycoffee.com/products/2026-dwight-aguilar-masias-yellow-gesha-peru
- · https://www.reddit.com/r/pourover/comments/1s6cp6s/sey_yellow_gesha_recipe/
- · https://beanhoard.com/roaster/sey/2026-dwight-aguilar-masias-yellow-gesha-peru
- · https://www.beanswithbeanie.com/coffee/dwight-aguilar-masias-yellow-gesha-sey
- · https://cherrybookcoffee.com/coffee/sey-2026-dwight-aguilar-masias-yellow-gesha-peru
In the database. Not tasted. Not scored.
This coffee is in our database because we can reliably document it — but we haven't tasted and scored it yet, and we never publish a score we haven't earned.
Outside reviews and internet discussion — is kept clearly separate from our own review. When we taste it, our full review appears here.
What the internet is saying about this coffee
AI-synthesized from publicly available information retrieved 2026-11-05. This is research, not our original tasting review.
One exact-release brewing thread is mixed-to-positive: several brewers found successful recipes and one commenter rated three preparations 8–9/10, while the original poster found the coffee difficult to dial in and another preferred gentler extraction.
One commenter reported 8/10 pour-over, 9/10 espresso and 9/10 over ice. Another said a 1:16 pour-over recipe worked well, and the thread includes multiple detailed recipes for the same February 16-roasted bag.
The original poster called the coffee tough to dial in; another brewer found higher extraction off-putting. One commenter also reported stale coffee associated with faulty bag valves, a packaging anecdote that cannot be generalized to every bag.
- r/pourover exact-release thread One commenter: pour-over 8/10, espresso 9/10, iced 9/10; not averaged
Scores remain on their original scales. An outside review, competition score or historical release is not our tasting and cannot safely be merged into one five-star rating.Our method
A qualitative summary of public sources, including context. Not a coffee score.
Try these next →
Other roasters, same producer.
These coffees come from the same producer or farm, offered by other roasters. We never automatically declare two offerings the exact same coffee — a match requires lot, harvest and traceability details. Even a true same-lot pair can taste different: roast approach, freshness, rest and brewing all reshape the cup.